One of the novellas I read in November for #novnov was The Abbess of Crewe a Muriel Spark novel I had been meaning to read since the read-a-long I hosted in 2018. Beneath the oddness and the wit in Muriel Spark’s novels there is usually something rather dark or disturbing going on, and this one is no exception.
“The self-controlled English sun makes leafy shadows fall on this polished table and across the floor. A bee importunes at the window-pane. The parlour is cool and fresh. A working nun can be seen outside labouring along with two pails, one of them probably unnecessary; and all things keep time with the season.”
Famously of course, The Abbess of Crewe is a satire on the Watergate Scandal – which was very much still a hot topic in the newspapers at the time the hurriedly written novel came out. I was a very young child during the Watergate Scandal, my knowledge of it coming from that film All the President’s Men when I was in my teens or early twenties. I don’t have a detailed, encyclopaedic knowledge of who did what, when etc – and when reading this novel that doesn’t matter at all. This edition comes with an excellent introduction written by Ali Smith at the end of which she provides a list of the probable equivalent roles of Spark’s characters to the real life figures they parody.
Muriel Spark replaces the American seat of government with a nunnery in the north of England. The politicians and their aides with nuns. It could only really have come from the extraordinary mind of Muriel Spark – and of course she does it well. While it might not be my favourite Spark novel – there is so much to admire in this novel, the clever plotting and detail that make it very much a part of a recognisable Sparkian world.
Following the death of Hildegarde the Abbey of Crewe is in need of a new Abbess – and an election will be held. There are two contenders for the role – Alexandra and Felicity. They are very different women; Alexandra is very traditional, part of the old guard. Felicity is free-love loving, consorting with Jesuit priests and keen to make big changes. Alexandra and her hangers on are trying to manage the coming election – and are concerned as Felicity appears to be gaining in popularity.
“Walberga says sharply, ‘This morning the polls put her at forty-two per cent according to my intelligence reports.’
‘It’s quite alarming,’ says Alexandra, ‘seeing that to be the Abbess of Crewe is my destiny.’ She has stopped walking and the two nuns have stopped with her. She stands facing them, drawing their careful attention to herself, lighthouse that she is. ‘Unless I fulfil my destiny my mother’s labour pains were pointless and what am I doing here?”
The abbey is bugged as part of the process of ensuring that Alexandra becomes the Abbess of Crewe. Walls inside and trees outside are all wired for sound – and the sisters in the abbey are all unknowingly assisting in the wiring. Alexandra listens in to the recordings, ready to use anything she hears to her advantage. Keeping a close eye – and ear – on all the sisters, and visitors to the abbey. Embracing the twentieth century the sisters are given courses in understanding electronics and surveillance. During mealtimes, where the nuns sit in silence they listen dutifully to bible readings, which will suddenly go off into little bits of technical instruction – slipped in subliminally – and apparently not noticed by the listeners. Another thing these poor unsuspecting sisters don’t notice is the food they are subjected to – heavily disguised pet food is dished up each day. Food Alexandra considers perfectly nourishing, it is of course bought cheaply in bulk. Only Alexandra and her minions know what is going on.
When Felicity’s thimble is apparently stolen from her sewing basket – it unleashes a nationwide scandal. However, it is her love letters to the Jesuit priest Thomas that both Felicity and Alexandra are most concerned about.
“…a Jesuit, or any priest for that matter, would be the last man I would myself elect to be laid by. A man who undresses, maybe; but one who unfrocks, no.”
After all it was Alexandra who instructed two young Jesuits to retrieve the letters. The missing thimble draws Felicity’s attention to the letters having been touched by someone other than herself. Suddenly, the abbey is under all kinds of scrutiny after Felicity calls the police and flees the abbey.
Alexandra is a brilliantly drawn character – I have seen reviewers refer to her as Nixon (or even Trump) in drag which is really quite funny. A power hungry megalomaniac who will do anything to get what she wants; she manipulates all around her.
This novella is brilliantly imagined, laugh out loud funny with a touch of something a little darker. Living in a world where political scandal is not just something that happened in 1970s America – this sharp little novella remains as relevant as ever.
What a grand imagination and daring swipe at politics she took in writing this, not to mention using another institution, known for its own collusion with state to demonstrate the corruption inherent in power and institutions.
It’s a fantastic work of imagination and definitely testament to Spark’s unique way of seeing things. She was a committed Catholic so it’s interesting that she took this swipe really, but brilliantly done.
I’m sorry to say, I had no idea that this was a satire on Watergate but having watched All the President’s Men again recently, I should read it.
I don’t think the reader needs to know about Watergate to enjoy this, but knowing its a satire adds some flavour.
I’m about to start The Ballad of Peckham Rye but might change my mind and go for this one instead!
I liked The Ballad of Peckham Rye but it didn’t resonate as much with me as others of hers. I hope you enjoy whichever you choose.
This sounds wonderful, I really need to get going with Muriel Spark and I love a ’70’s setting
It is great fun, well imagined.
This sounds really good. I remember Watergate well and now have an even greater interest in reading it. I just finished Sparks’ Aiding and Abetting and just have four more of her novels to read, plus the short stories. Thanks for an appealing review.
Aiding and Abetting is another great Spark novella, she has such a way of looking at situations we already know.
I’ve not read this but I adore Spark so I do want to get to it. I’d expect a hastily written satire to really flounder but the fact that it’s still relevant speaks to how clever she was.
The introduction sets out how fast this one was written, she squeezed the publication in between two other novels. It’s incredibly sharply observed considering how quickly she wrote it.
Love the sound of this, Ali – what a hoot! It’s not a Spark I’ve read but I will check to see if I have it. I know of Watergate, though don’t really remember it, but I love All the President’s Men so will enjoy comparing with the book. She was such a unique writer!
She was so unique! It’s such a long time since I saw that film, I would be interested to watch it again now.
Isn’t it weird and good? Two words that describe so much about Spark. The cover of my edition said it was based on Watergate, so I knew it going in, but my knowledge of that is pretty weak. It also says on my edition that it was turned into a movie with Glenda Jackson called Dirty Habits 😀
Oh yes, it’s weird and good. I hadn’t heard of that film, what a title! Just looked it up, a 1977 comedy set in a Philedelphian convent, they couldn’t call it The Abbess of Crewe. 😄
A Spark I haven’t read and I love that she shifted a government scandal into such a different setting! I do remember something about Watergate – my parents watched the Congressional hearings when I was young and I couldn’t believe that people still defended Nixon. Ah, the moral clarity of youth…
It’s such a clever way of satirising the Watergate scandal. I think sometimes children have a very clear sighted way of seeing things.
Straight on the list, no question. (In fact, you had me at Watergate!) I’m running out of unread Spark novels in my TBR, so this will be my next addition. She really does have the most curious and creative imagination, doesn’t she? And that’s definitely perceptible here. Great review as ever, Ali. You make this sounds so enticing!
I think you will appreciated this one Jacqui. Spark was definitely curious and creative, unique really in the way she looked at things.
Gosh, this sounds like a peculiar one, but very clever, as ever.
Oh yes very clever, Muriel Spark does look at situations quite uniquely.
I love that little grid of keys at the bottom of these reissue covers, a typewriter keyboard to help you obsess about gathering up all the copies you’re missing!
I only need to find one more now, though it is proving elusive. Very frustrating.