Translated from Russian by Sasha Dugdale
In Memory of Memory is a book that has been reviewed brilliantly by so many other bloggers, that if I am honest, I haven’t really been looking forward to trying to write about it. It is a book that is difficult to categorise, I have generally seen it described as autofiction –though it was published by Fitzcarraldo with a white cover, signifying non-fiction, but shortlisted for the International Booker Prize which is for fiction. So, I was a bit confused before I even opened it. Perhaps an exact categorisation doesn’t much matter, because what ever way you categorise this book, it is a remarkable achievement. A complex work which combines, memoir, essay, fiction, history, and travel to slowly reveal the story of a family and the Europe in which they lived and died along with an exploration of culture and memory. It is a fascinating and thoroughly immersive work, not a quick or easy read but one I am glad I tackled for this year’s #Witmonth.
When the author Maria Stepanova’s aunt dies, she is left with an apartment full of ephemera to sort through. Letters, postcards, souvenirs alongside the more personal things like diaries and photographs. Together these represent a century of life in Russia – a century during which the world changed and changed again. Carefully, over time Stepanova begins to piece together the story of this fairly ordinary Jewish family, who – despite the odds, the numerous persecutions, wars, and hardships – managed to survive.
“…that’s why I love photographs that need no interlocutor and have no desire to engage with me. They are in their own way, rehearsals for non-existence, for life without us, for the time when the room is no longer ours to enter.”
I think I have a similar feeling for photographs – well old photographs at least – Instagram has rather changed our relationship with photographs now I think. In fact, Stepanova discusses this very thing – the modern cult of the Selfie as she examines Rembrandt’s self-portraits. There are many fascinating cultural, literary, and artistic references and portraits throughout this book, setting the times of her family in yet another context. All families have those piles or albums of old photographs which when got out spark a memory or a long forgotten story. Those stories weave together to make a complete and complex picture of life – and this book does something very like that.
These stories are elusive, fragmentary and Stepanova has to fill in some gaps for us – this in no way a linear biography of a family, there is much more going on here than that. In order to fill in those gaps she travels around Russia, she goes to the places her family once lived she sees and experiences these places and shares them with us. Maria Stepanova had wanted to write a book about her family since childhood, so in a sense this is a quest for herself an intelligent, loving and ever curious examination of the past. She discusses the very nature of memory, how our memory can’t always be entirely relied upon.
As readers we are left with the memory of a host of vibrant personalities. Too many to write about here – but for me, two women emerged from the shadows of the past – and their stories held me fast. The first was Charlotte Salomon an artist, who I hadn’t heard of previously. She died in Auschwitz. Though Stepanova wants us to see her as much more than another victim of horror. Salomon wasn’t a member of Stepanova’s family, she is one among many artists and writers like Sebald, Susan Sontag, Barthes and even Dickens who come find their way into the pages of this book. The Second of those women was Stepanova’s Great-grandmother Sarra Ginzburg, a doctor who had studied in Paris but returned to the Soviet Union to practise.
“The ability to skip large chunks of time might be useful in the writing of novels, but it starts to frighten me when I realize I am doing it in life, and with real living people – that is, with dead people, of course, although there isn’t really any difference. Great-grandmother Sarra’s youth before Lyolya was born feels like the beginning. Everything is ahead of her, anything could happen. After 1916 time begins folding itself up, tightening into the felt roll of collective fate. A hundred years later I began following in her footsteps, visiting her St. Petersburg addresses, buildings with rebuilt facades, missing apartments and whole missing wings, in poor areas of the city, lit by the setting sun and inhabited by flocks of Sunday soldiers. It always seemed that if I took just another turn to the right, then that would be enough, I could transform her life, restore it, make it fit to be seen again.”
Of course, it isn’t just the women who have extraordinary stories to tell. One especially memorable one that of Leonid Gimmelfarb, Stepanova’s grandfather’s nineteen year old cousin, who was fighting in the marshes and forests near Leningrad during the siege. He wrote regularly to his mother, and his letters are poignant though often matter of fact, he asks often after the family he has left behind.
The book as I said already isn’t structured in any linear way, Stepanova organises her book around various ideas or particular people. Interspersed with these chapters are short sections called ‘not-a- chapter’ in which through letter extracts we hear from some of these people themselves. The whole becomes a wonderfully personal work, as well as a thoroughly immersive one. Stepanova’s prose is absolutely gorgeous, I wasn’t at all surprised to learn that she is a poet.
On a personal level while I enjoyed this book very much, I was probably a little less wowed by it than many others. There is a huge amount to admire in this book, the writing is glorious and I found I was learning about so many fascinating people. However, the fragmentary nature of it took me a while to settle into, and for a while I kept getting people mixed up. Overall, though it is an extraordinary piece of writing and I am very glad I have read it.
I’ve seen such rave reviews for this one but was on the fence about whether it would be my cup of tea or not. It was definitely useful to read a more balanced take on it!
Good, I would definitely say it’s worth the effort. The writing alone is lovely.
Interesting take on the book, Ali – it *is* unusual and a real mix of types of writing. I loved it, but I totally accept not everyone would feel the same about it. I’m very glad you enjoyed it though
Yes, I enjoyed it very much in the end. In the beginning I was trying to get to grips with what it was and remember who all the people mentioned were. Of course as the book goes on, those people are returned to and I began to feel I knew them.
As a librarian, I am glad it didn’t have to catalog this! LOL Your review is every interseting.
Ha, yes I hadn’t even considered that aspect. I suspect it would be shelved with memoirs, though actually who knows. 😄
At the moment I don’t think my poor brain can manage a fragmentary text like this one! It does sound fascinating though – one for when I feel able to concentrate more easily.
I probably could have chosen a better time myself to read this, I am horribly distracted at the moment. Still, it does need some concentration, so picking the right time is a good idea.
I eagerly bought this, but I have to say the reviews are making me feel a bit nervous about tackling it – though also was keen to do so during WIT month. Let’s see!
I felt rather nervous myself to be honest. It felt more non fiction than fiction to me I must say, and as you probably know I read very little non fiction. So it felt slightly challenging, but there is some reward in the effort.
Very attracted to this one whose structure seems to mimic memory which seems to become increasingly unreliable over time. At least mine does!
Oh yes, I think you’re right about the structure mimicking memory, in some ways it does.
You’ve reminded me that I mean to read this, it does sound interesting. You struck a cord with me when you said that you had read so many brilliant reviews. . . that always worries me!
I worry about that a lot, being a harsh critic of myself, but all a blogger can do is write an honest reaction. It’s a review, not an academic essay or anything. I would recommend this as an intelligent, immersive read.
Your description of taking some to get into this book resonates strongly with me right now. Just started a book where is that is the case though for a different reason. You’ve written wonderfully about a book that must be almost impossible to describe and one I’m looking forward to reading.
Well thank you very much, I really hope you enjoy it too.
A gorgeous post on what sounds like a truly fascinating book. (I’m so glad you decided to write about it!) I love the idea of piecing together this picture of a century of Russian life through photographs, diaries and other sources – together with Stepanova’s own travels, of course. it reminds me a little of Julia Parry’s book about her grandparents and Elizabeth Bowen, although the Stepanova is much broader and more ambitious in scope.
I’m trying really hard not to buy books at the moment, so this will be going on my wishlist, maybe as a possibility for Christmas. Thanks again for writing about it, Ali – it’s a brilliant choice for WIT Month.
That Julia Parry book really sounds excellent, and although the Stepanova book does have a broader approach I’m sure you would find a lot to appreciate in it. I hope you enjoy when you eventually get to it.
A lovely balanced review – and nice to see Karen has read it as I was thinking it was just her sort of thing as I read your review! Maybe the lives and history were so fragmentary, this was the only way to do it.
Thank you. Yes, this was probably the only way for her to approach this book.
This book sounds wonderful. Thanks for your review.
Glad you like the sound of it.
Looking, not looking. 🙂 Seen too many good reviews, I’m kind of relieved you were less wowed, I can wait a bit for this one too.
Yes, it was all those reviews which tempted me I’m afraid.
Ohh, I think I might like this one…
Yay 😁