This Persephone volume of London War Notes proving once again that I am not always very good at reading nonfiction. I started this huge Persephone a couple of days before Christmas when I had lots of reading time, then on Boxing day decided to take a break from it to read a classic crime from the British Library – finally finishing it on New Year’s Eve. It is a book I know a lot of people love – and I have certainly loved Mollie Panter-Downes fiction – and it seems that I do engage with her fiction better. Still there is a lot to admire in this collection, which I have had tbr for some time. After I had finished the book I realised that of course I would probably have done better to read these pieces over a much longer period of time, dipping in and out – after all the pieces were never originally intended to be read one after the other in this way.
Of course, Mollie Panter-Downes has written about the Second World War in her fiction too, two collections of her short stories, one about wartime and one peacetime are well loved among Persephone readers. While her beautiful novel One Fine Day (1947) takes place in the first real summer of peacetime – 1946 – as families all over the world were learning to adapt to the changes that peacetime brought with it. London War Notes brings us into the war pretty much as it was happening. What she does brilliantly, and right from the first page – is to capture a mood – recreating a kind of collective British (well certainly an English) voice.
“For a week, everybody in London had been saying every day that if there wasn’t a war tomorrow there wouldn’t be a war. Yesterday, people were saying that if there wasn’t a war today it would be a bloody shame. Now there is a war, the English, slow to start, have already in spirit started and are comfortably two laps ahead of the official war machine, which had to wait to drop off somebody’s handkerchief.”
Between the 3rd of September 1939 and May 12th, 1945 Mollie Panter-Downes wrote one hundred and fifty three ‘Letters from London’ for the New Yorker magazine – these are they. This complete collection of them first published in 1971 provides an incredible picture of real wartime life – throughout her tone is delightfully confiding and warm, sometimes amusing or a little cutting – most of all she is honest. She did not seek to curry favour with the government of the day – in fact, she can be sometimes rather critical but capable of praise or appreciation where she considers it due. There is a wisdom in her observant eye and a deep understanding for the people of Britain to whom she was clearly loyal and of whom she was very proud.
In these pieces we observe the first almost disbelieving shock of being at war – barrage balloons in the skies as retired army officers answer the call. ‘Battalions of women’ did so too – anxious to do whatever they could. The evacuation of children from London, and the strangeness of the parks without them. Her observations have something of the novelist’s eye about them, she notices the mothers left behind, the cartons that carry gasmasks – which could be transporting grapes to a sick friend, the advertisements offering sanctuary to London pets. She is tuned in to the varied voices around her the rumour, criticism, the anxieties, and stoicism – the hope.
“The last week has been a bad one. The calmness and cheerfulness of the ordinary citizen aren’t in themselves new or surprising, for to be long on both those qualities is part of the national character. Unless it is stiffened by a realistic comprehension of what it may be required to face, such an attitude is possibly as irritating to objective observers as the blithe unconcern of someone taking his usual constitutional along a cliff which everyone knows is in danger of falling.”
She tells us about the ordinary London dweller – their opinions their reactions to each new development. The reality of rationing, the disappearance of eggs Those who watched the Russians arriving with some suspicion, unused to thinking of them as allies. Reporting on what the government were doing or saying, the reactions to German invasions of Greece or Yugoslavia.
“This Sunday morning’s news of Germany’s aggression against Yugoslavia and Greece was the climax of a fortnight so bewildering that Britons have hardly known from one moment to another what emotions they were going to be called upon to register next.”
I couldn’t help but think how different those times were from today with our constant rolling news, the ability, should we be so inclined to absorb hours of new bulletins – never waiting more than a few minutes for an update. Living in such turbulent times when news was much less readily available must have been quite agonising – those few news bulletins each day a must for many.
The final few entries I found particularly poignant – especially coming after such a lot of long, detailed pieces – that sense of finally the madness ending. Another kind of disbelief as the blackout curtains start to come down and some London restaurants begin to open their doors in celebration. The relief is palpable.
This book is undoubtedly fascinating, Panter-Downes is a really excellent writer – but it is also quite big and quite dense – and I probably didn’t really do it justice by reading it in the way that I did.
I’ve had my eye on this for a while and never taken the plunge, but your review has inspired me to do so! I’ve often read a book like this straight through and then realised I should have dipped in and out – it kind of goes against my natural reading style, but I think there’s a lot to be said for taking some books in stages.
Yes, I’m sure dipping in and out would be a good idea. Really hope you enjoy it.
Lovely review Ali! The books sounds fascinating and I will try and get hold of it!
Thank you, yes there are lots of fascinating details on this one.
I loved One Fine Day and all her short stories but I still haven’t finished London War Notes. I enjoy reading history & 20th century social history is a particular interest yet these pieces failed to engage me. Perhaps it is a collection best read slowly, at a rate of one or two a day. Your comments about the later pieces hook me back in, so I will give it another go.
Yes, I think I might have enjoyed it more had I read it more slowly. I also love her fiction, and 20th century social history is fascinating to me, though I tend to read it through fiction of the times.
I’m a huge fan of her writing too but I think you’re right about the way to read this book. I picked it up early in the first lockdown and was trying to read it through in one go but got bogged down. It definitely warrants dipping alongside other books!
I can completely understand how you got bogged down with this. There are such a lot of entries and fascinating though they are many are very dense, especially those about military goings on and government doings.
Like you, I’m not great at reading non-fiction but this sounds unmissable. I suspect Mollie Panter-Downes dispatches were very much better thought out than much of modern journalism.
She is so engaging that I think she must have come across much better to many readers than the average journalist of the times.
I’m also not much of a non-fiction reader these days; I used to primarily read non-fiction, but I’ve mended my ways. MPD’s letters sound like an incredibly vivid piece of social history that would be a “must” for anyone interested in the WWII period. I actually have this Persephone edition, which is gathering dust on the shelf; perhaps later in the year . . . .
A vivid piece of social history describes it perfectly. I am always fascinated by WW2 but generally read about it through fiction.
I love the quotes you’ve pulled out from this collection. They really give a feel for the collective mood and tone at the time. And I’m sure you’re right about the best way to read it. Dipping in and out, spreading the volume over a reasonable length of time would probably lead to a greater appreciation of each individual piece. I often encounter this problem myself when reading short stories as it’s so easy to OD on them without realising it at the time. It’s only when we look back and try and recall them…then it becomes clear that they’ve merged into one !
Thank you Jacqui, I would recommend dipping in and out. I often gulp short stories down too, I never learn, but should try a different approach. I just don’t usually like having more than one book on the go.
I went back to my review from 2016 (you gave me my copy in 2015!) to see if I mentioned how I read it, I am pretty sure I did so alongside other books, though, not all in one gulp. It gave a different kind of view, didn’t it, being a public work as such rather than a private diary or a fictional version. https://librofulltime.wordpress.com/2016/12/24/book-review-london-war-notes-persephone/
Yes the fact that she was writing regularly for an American audience does give it a different kind of view.
A book I’d love to have to dip into. I’ve read some of her New Yorker pieces and was very struck by them. I agree with Jacqui about the quotes you’ve used and would love to know how her writing influenced American public opinion, especially when the country was baulking at getting into the war.
Well I suspect there was just a little propaganda about the earlier pieces from before the US entered the fray. Though I do think she is quite subtle about it. I had to wonder myself what the readers of the New Yorker thought at the time.
I wondered, when I saw your post, if A Very Great Profession had opened the floodgates for non-fiction! Maybe not – though glad you got something out of it. It’s my second favourite of her books, after One Fine Day, I think.
Well no not quite. It may have been too much non-fiction all at once for me. I do like the way Mollie Panter Downes writes however. I just engage with her fiction better.
Lthink we get into the habit of reading all in one go and you’re right, sometimes it just isn’t the way to go about it – I would like to read this so will take your advice!
Excellent, I hope you enjoy it, I do think reading it slowly along side other books is the way to go.
That’s an interesting observation and maybe it’s reads like this that help us learn how to adjust our reading habits. We’re lifelong readers, so maybe we are inclined to think that, surely by now we know all we need to know about reading, but not all books require the same kind/amount of attention. This might be one of those reads better enjoyed in a weekly devotion than in a focussed series of sittings; maybe you’ll be inspired to try a different approach with another volume because of this experience. And, regardless, some books are more to be admired than adored, don’t you think?
Yes, I may employ that method of reading large story and essay collections, those sort of volumes particularly lend themselves to that I think.