
Although I have pre-ordered new releases a few times before it’s not something I do very often – and never have I felt swept along by the hype of new book like I was this one. If I am honest, I had never thought that The Handmaid’s Tale needed a sequel – but once the fact of it was a known thing – I wanted to read it. So, yes, the hype has been insane, but the book is honestly excellent, it’s an absolute triumph on many levels. One of the ideas I love most in this novel is how the very act of storytelling can be an act of rebellion – even if, maybe especially if, you can’t be sure your words will ever find a reader.
“Where there is an emptiness, the mind will obligingly fill it up. Fear is always at hand to supply any vacancies, as is curiosity. I have had ample experience with both.”
I love Margaret Atwood – I find her so wise and inspiring, and I really love The Handmaid’s Tale which I re-read with my book group a couple of years ago. Re-reading Handmaid is a good idea I think if you’re embarking on The Testaments many moons after first visiting Gilead.
I wasn’t sure exactly how to go about this review – so many people are reviewing it at the moment, and I have been avoiding blogger reviews until I had written my own. I am going to attempt to keep this as spoiler free as possible, certainly there will be no major plot spoilers, though if you’re going to be reading this next week proceed with caution. (There are THT spoilers ahead though).
“The corrupt and blood-smeared fingerprints of the past must be wiped away to create a clean space for the morally pure generation that is surely about to arrive. Such is the theory.”
It is fairly well known I think that The Testaments is not a continuation of The Handmaid’s Tale as such. Instead it’s more of a re-examination of the Gilead we think we know, from Atwood’s 1985 classic. Set around fifteen years after the end of The Handmaid’s Tale, The Testaments offers us another view of the society of Gilead. We all know how that earlier book ended with Offred heading off who knows where in the back of a van. Many of us wanted to know more – wondered what became of Offred, the symposium at the end of The Handmaid’s Tale leaves us with the idea that at some point Gilead ended – but how? Offred’s position in that earlier novel was such that her view of Gilead was necessarily narrow – there was just so much she couldn’t know or wasn’t allowed to know; her perception of Gilead’s society is therefore skewed. What The Testaments does brilliantly is to open up Gilead to the reader in way Offred’s account wasn’t able to. Atwood is brilliant at creating an altered world, a society with different rules and traditions.
The Testaments is told in three different voices – the testaments of the title. The first testament we discover within a page or two is being related by Aunt Lydia – who readers will remember from the earlier novel – a character who has become a huge part of the TV spin off series.
“Two roads diverged in a yellow wood, and I took the one most travelled by. It was littered with corpses, as such roads are. But as you will have noticed, my own corpse is not among them.”
The other two testaments are told by young women – looking back at their adolescence/teenage years, as they came of age and began to make discoveries about the world they were living in. One of these young women has grown up in Gilead, the other has grown up across the boarder in Canada, where she has witnessed protests against Gilead, and the visits of the Pearl Girls – sort of missionaries from Gilead. The stories that Atwood weaves through these three testimonies are so compelling, full of twists and surprises, as ever her storytelling is perfect – and she writes so well too. There is such wisdom in this novel, such understanding of how people act – there is also so many wonderful, quotable nuggets of excellence.
“You don’t believe the sky is falling until a chunk of it falls on you.”
When we consider totalitarian regimes – and the world has seen its fair share of them – what we often ask ourselves is how are ordinary people persuaded to collaborate with what they must know to be evil? This question is explored in the story of Aunt Lydia particularly, and it is a fascinating element, it’s a chilling idea, that intelligent people, previously politically unengaged can be so easily coerced.
“You pride yourself on being a realist, I told myself, so face the facts. There’s been a coup, here in the United States, just as in times past in so many other countries. Any forced change of leadership is always followed by a move to crush the opposition. The opposition is led by the educated, so the educated are the first to be eliminated.”
The Testaments is a wonderful achievement, for an author to return to her fictional world after so long, and to do it so convincingly is extraordinary.
It seems impossible that this would live up to the hype, but if anyone can manage it, Margaret Atwood can! It’s a good tip about re-reading THT, its been about 25 years since I last read it (gulp!) so I’ll do that first.
I hope you enjoy your re-read of The Handmaid’s Tale, it’s still an extraordinary novel I think.
I’m so glad that this lived up to your expectations in the end. Always a difficult thing for any sequel to do, especially given the level of anticipation associated with this one.
I’ve seen some suggestions that Aunt Lydia’s is the most compelling of the three voices in The Testaments. How did you feel about the other two? Do they complement one another by adding different dimensions to the overall narrative?
Yes I do think Aunt Lydia’s voice is the strongest, which reflects her position in the society of Gilead. The other two voices definitely bring in another element.
It’s so hard to see through all that dazzling hype that I’ve been waiting for a review from someone whose opinion I trust. It’s now on my list. Thanks, Ali.
I understand people being put off by the hype, hype can sometimes have a negative effect. I hope you enjoy it too if you get round to it.
I’ve adopted exactly the same approach! Now I’ve seen Ali’s reactions I feel much more inclined to read this for myself
Yay, I’m so glad.
Great review and I’m glad you were pleased with it, too. It certainly gave me what I wanted. As you say, it’s a good idea to re-read The Handmaid’s Tale before embarking on this one, and I am glad I did that. A review I’ve read made the point of how even women’s words to each other are monitored and self-censored and I think that’s a very powerful insight into totalitarian states. I’m glad we got to read this at the same time and to hear your thoughts on it.
Oh yes, women’s words to each other are self-censored, how interesting. I really enjoyed reading it at the same time as so many other people.
[…] Ali’s review here. Of course we read it at the same time. Her review is longer but doesn’t have spoilers, […]
Well it sounds marvellous and very timely, of course. The fact that you and Liz think so highly makes me confident that I’ll enjoy it when I get to reading it! 😀
Yay, I’m so glad you think you might read it too one day. I would love to hear your thoughts on it.
What an enthusiastic post! So glad to hear you enjoyed it. I saw, in your Twitter, that you attended the London event as well? I was at one of the theatre launches and it was felt like such a privilege to attend and enjoy. Loved every minute of it!
I was at a live screening of the event from London. It was screened at over 1000 cinemas worldwide. Was that the one you attended? It was fantastic, so glad I went.
Brilliant, thank you! Isn’t it great when the hype is worth it? I’m going to hear her speak in October and am feeling quite gushy about it!
I do think the hype was worth it. Of course not everyone agrees, as I have seen a couple of lacklustre reviews but I think it was great.
I will miss her October appearance here as I am going away that day. I enjoyed the live screening on the day the book was released.
Interesting review but, much as I love Atwood, I’m not sure I will read this. I’ve read (and re-read) most of her novels, short stories and poems – with the exception of The Handmaid’s Tale, which was much too bleak a view of humanity for me. It may be a failing on my part, but I cannot cope with dystopian futuristic novels.
If you feel like that about dystopian novels then this might not be for you. Atwood is so versatile as a writer though that there is plenty of other things to keep re-reading.
Really not something I was going to pick up but it sounds better than I thought it would.
I’m glad you like the sound of it more now. I was already a massive Atwood fan though.
[…] most talked about book for a long time, The Testaments did not disappoint me. It is a triumphant return to Gilead, and answers some of the questions fans […]
[…] to Margaret Atwood and Bernardine Evaristo. Regular readers will remember how much I enjoyed The Testaments – but then I am a fan of Margaret Atwood. However, I must say that I never saw it as a Booker […]
Great post! I loved this book- check out my review on my blog and see if you agree with anything I think 🙂
Thank you.