Liking a WW2 novel as I do, I chose The Night Watch for my 2006 slot of A Century of Books. I have only read one other Sarah Waters novel – Fingersmith, but that was ten years ago. The Night Watch is very different to that novel – but just as compelling. So often I seem drawn to small novels and this was quite a chunky book at something like 500 pages– though I read it on my kindle. I really enjoyed the way Sarah Waters writes, characters are well drawn, and the period detail is spot on. I shall certainly read more; The Paying Guests has been recommended to me by several people.
“The best thing to do was to brazen it out, throw your head back, walk with a swagger, make a ‘character’ of yourself. It was tiring, sometimes, when you hadn’t the energy for it; that’s all.”
The narrative is told backwards, beginning in 1947 and moving back to 1941 – the beginning of the story. If that sounds confusing – fear not – it isn’t – everything holds together really well. I found myself compelled to read on quickly, to find out what significance things referred to in 1947 had in the past, it’s a very clever and effective way of telling a story.
It is the story of four women, and one young man, their war, their loves and griefs. Sarah Waters tells a story of dark, wartime nights, as bombs rain down on London. It is a story of a time when all the rules changed – for a while at least – a time when women who looked a bit like men and drove ambulances or carried stretchers were not so remarked upon. A time of prejudice and illicit love affairs. It was a time of death, destruction and fear in the long watches of the night. Everyone was changed, war left a terrible legacy all over the world.
“There was still murder, starvation, unrest, in Poland, Palestine, India—God knew where else. Britain itself was sliding into bankruptcy and decay. Was it a kind of idiocy or selfishness, to want to be able to give yourself over to trifles: to the parp of the Regent’s Park Band; to the sun on your face, the prickle of grass beneath your heels, the movement of cloudy beer in your veins, the secret closeness of your lover? Or were those trifles all you had? Oughtn’t you, precisely, to preserve them? To make little crystal drops of them, that you could keep, like charms on a bracelet, to tell against danger when next it came?”
Kay is in her late thirties, she drove ambulances during the war, now she watches out the window of her room or walks miles around London, nursing her own sadness. She dresses in mannish clothes, walking with a swagger that belies her inner turmoil. With the war over and obviously alone, it seems Kay no longer has a place in the world, as she walks the war-scarred streets she seems to be searching. Those around her watch her with concern, like Mr Leonard her landlord.
“He must have supposed she haunted the attic floor like a ghost or a lunatic. He was right, in a way. For sometimes she walked restlessly about, just as lunatics were said to. And other times she’d sit still, for hours at a time—stiller than a shadow, because she’d watch the shadows creeping across the rug. And then it seemed to her that she really might be a ghost, that she might be becoming part of the faded fabric of the house, dissolving into the gloom which gathered, like dust, in its crazy angles. A train ran by, two streets away, heading into Clapham Junction; she felt the thrill and shudder of it in the sill beneath her arms.”
Helen, pretty and liked it seems by everyone is nursing a personal secret. Now she is living with mystery writer Julia, who she is in love with, but Helen’s love is infused with jealousy. During the war Julia sorted through the rubble of destroyed homes, picking over the debris of shattered lives. Helen and Viv work in a match making agency, for people who have lost their loves during the war and want to start again. Needy and insecure, Helen considers confiding in Viv while at work, but can’t quite manage to do so.
Viv is the youngest of the three women, she lives with her father, and remains stubbornly loyal to her married, soldier lover. One day she spots someone she met during the war – and sets out to bump into her again, carrying a small gold ring in her pocket.
Duncan, Viv’s brother – carries his own peculiar scars from the war, but they aren’t from battle. He is living in digs in the house of Mr Mundy and working in a candle factory. One day Robert Fraser, a face from Duncan’s past pays a visit to the candle factory. He is clearly shocked at the way Duncan has chosen to live, little realising how damaged by the past Duncan is.
As the story moves back to the beginning – the lives of these characters weave together in often surprising ways. There are tantalizing little hints throughout the novel to what has gone before – as Water’s cleverly, and subtly peels back the layers of her each of her characters – so that as the novel ends, we meet them all for the first time, and know them fully.
Great review, one that reminds me of the time I spent with this book when it came out in paperback. I think it’s my favourite Sarah Waters so far (although I haven’t read The Paying Guests, which sounds equally good). I loved the evocation of London in the midst of WW2 – as you’ve highlighted above, the period detail felt so authentic.
Thank you, yes the period detail was so well done which was particularly pleasing for me as I do love that period.
That sounds so clever and well-done, she’s a really good writer technically, I think, and does her research but then doesn’t push it too much into the story. “The Loved and Envied” by Enid Bagnold, which I’m reading at the moment, jumps around like mad and is just confusing, so I’d appreciate a well-done odd timescale at the moment!
Oh yes you can tell that Sarah Waters does her research well, everything feels authentic and right. How disappointing that the Enid Bagnold is like that, I have one of hers on my kindle waiting to be read, but I don’t think it’s that one. Hope it becomes less confusing as it goes on.
Done, and not really any less confusing, although at least the narrative stayed in the same era for a big chunk of the last part. Not sure what to write in my review now!
As you say well-written and compelling, I too enjoyed The Night Watch. I especially appreciated the structure of the narrative and how it digs backwards relentlessly, revealing motivation in a different way and giving the reader a new perspective on storyline.
Great review. Caroline
I thought the structure worked so well, in a way the structure is really important to how the story works as a whole.
This is still my favourite Waters book. Loved its structure.
So many people have said this was their favourite, I can see why.
This is a tremendous read, much enjoyed by a book group I was a member of a few years ago. I thought that it was quite brilliantly written, so I’m glad that you also think it works well. The adaptation starring Anna Maxwell Martin is also worth watching if you can find it.
I shall look out for the adaptation, I imagine it would be good. I’m glad your book group liked it so much, it’s such a good, multi-layered novel.
Sounds great Ali – I;ve never read Waters but it sounds brilliantly put together.
It really is, she is a good writer, I had forgotten how good, not having read her for 10 years.
Waters is one of the few long-book-writers whose books don’t feel unwieldy to me. I really liked this one, though I wish the backwards structure had been used to a little more effect.
I know what you mean, although being over 500 pages The Night Watch is so readable and zips along in such a compelling way, that it doesn’t feel over long.
I really enjoyed this and you’ve absolutely captured why. Waters is so good at her plotting, but never at the expense of believable characters, and her research never overwhelms the story. As Simon says, her books are long but not a heavy read – I always whizz through her!
I’m going to have to find another one of hers to read I think. So many people love her books.
As others have said, The Paying Guests is a good one!
The Night Watch is my favourite of her books. I’m very much looking forward to the movie of The Luttle Stranger also.
Funnily enough, I only realised there was a The Little Stranger film yesterday, when I was at the cinema to see The Children Act and saw a leaflet about it.
Ooh, how was The Children Act? I do love Stanley Tucci…
Very good, he was great, as was Emma Thompson, who I love.
Lovely review – I can’t think of a good reason why but I’ve never read Sarah Waters! I have been meaning to for ages. This one does sound good.
I bet this would be a good place to start, though having only read two, I am probably not the best person to advise you. She is an excellent story teller.
[…] trip to the Isle of Wight, having been reminded of poor hotel lighting when I was in Belgium. I read The Night Watch by Sarah Waters – a novel of considerably more than 500 pages – it zips along art a cracking […]
There was so much to like about this one, so well-written, beautiful atmosphere – but I do not understand the point of the backwards structure. I wish someone could explain/convince me!
I thought the backward structure was crucial for peeling away the layers of the characters and their individual stories. The same story told in a linear fashion would have been less affecting and quite ordinary.